It means being able to release improvements for this operating system is exceptional enough that we feel like we should inform people. In fact, this is the second time this year that we publish a macOS-only news post, which is not a good sign at all. So, adding a comparison with similar tasks made on Apple software (or software used with all Apple Silicon optimizations) would add a lot of context to these benchmarks. For at least the past 10 years, GIMP has not been able to have two active macOS developers at once. ![]() Similarly, I only use Apple Compressor for HEVC exports - it uses VideoToolbox and all the available silicon and that makes a big difference. ![]() I do question the relevance of the benchmarks, in particular regarding the optimization (or lack thereof) of apps for Apple Silicon, and in particular the use or not of dedicated silicon on Apple Silicon.Īpple Silicon has many dedicated units (such as the neural engine, ProRes or HEVC encoders/decoders) and optimization for those is not just a question of compling for Apple Silicon.įor example, I am pretty sure that Final Cut Pro is way faster than Premiere Pro on Apple Silicon, because it uses the dedicated ProRes/HEVC encoders/decoders on Apple's chips. So if youre ok with a slightly different workflow (which in. What Affinity Photo also does, is non-destructive editing, which is a huge plus for me. The biggest drawback of Gimp is its workflow, but if youre comfortable with it, then its most likely a good thing for you. Better handling of the Exif Orientation metadata. I would always prefer Affinity Photo to Gimp. I have no doubt that many of them are faster than M2 Max. Download GIMP for Windows to gain power and flexibility of transforming. ![]() It would be nice to change the title from "Intel has a faster processor than M2 Max, but at what cost?" to "Intel has a faster laptop processor than M2 Max, but at what cost?"
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |